Griven
|
52:6f:63:6b:27:6e:27:52:6f:6c:6c49:66:20:79:6f:75:20:68:61:64:20:74:6f:20:63:68:6f:6f:73:65:20:6f:
6e:65:1f:20:77:68:69:63:68:20:6f:6e:65:20:77:6f:75:6c:64:20:79:6f:
75:20:63:68:6f:6f:73:65:3f
|
Shensenn
|
Hmm, tough choice.
|
Dew
|
Fixed to conform with forum policies
|
Nuri
|
| Dew wrote: | Fixed to conform with forum policies  |
Don't you mean:
49:20:61:6d:20:4e:79:76:1f:20:49:20:77:69:6c:6c:20:6b:69:6c:6c:20:46:65:64:21?
While option 4 would be appropriate for some and a very popular choice, the ultimate decision would depend up the specifics of 1 and 3.
47:72:69:76:1f:20:73:6f:6d:65:74:69:6d:65:73:20:49:20:74:68:69:6e:6b
79:6f:75:20:68:61:76:65:20:74:6f:6f:20:6d:75:63:68:20:74:69:6d:65
6f:6e:20:79:6f:75:72:20:68:61:6e:64:73:2e:20
4e:69:63:65:20:50:6f:6c:6c:2e:20:3a:29
(Yes, I inserted breaks there to keep my post from ending up too wide.)
|
Griven
|
49:20:68:61:76:65:20:66:61:72:20:74:6f:6f:20:6d:75:63:68:20:74:
69:6d:65:20:6f:6e:20:6d:79:20:68:61:6e:64:73:2e:20:20:49:20:6e:
65:65:64:20:61:20:68:6f:62:62:79:2e
|
Meh
|
...what is all this gibberish???
|
Griven
|
| Meh wrote: | | ...what is all this gibberish??? |
49:74:27:73:20:68:65:78:20:63:6f:64:65:2e:20:20:44:75:68:2e
|
Meh
|
Okay, that's nice, but WHAT IS IT???
|
Griven
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal
|
Meh
|
I'm a hopeless case, I guess. I can't decipher it, lol.
>.>
|
Nuri
|
53:63:6f:72:65:20:6f:6e:65:20:66:6f:72:20:47:72:69:76:65:6e:2e
|
Griven
|
54:6f:6f:20:62:61:64:20:49:20:73:74:6f:70:70:65:64:20:6b:65:
65:70:69:6e:67:20:63:6f:75:6e:74:20:61:20:6c:6f:6e:67:20:74:
69:6d:65:20:61:67:6f:2e
|
inegrado'
|
Voted #1, it seemes obvious.....
|
Iago
|
| inegrado' wrote: | | Voted #1, it seemes obvious..... |
/agreed ...and I did so before I translated the question.
|